Duel: boss cyan vs def, AEROWALK, 20 Jan 2006

Duel (AEROWALK)

boss cyan

def

Rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

10 minutes, Deathmatch 3, Teamplay 2

Fri 20 January 2006 on OFQSP | Ktpro | Virginia

low	avg	high	team	total	players	RA	YA	GA
52	52	52	the	26	1	13	15	9
39	40	39	[ag]	13	1	10	9	15

ping	frags	team	name	Kills	Deaths	RA	YA	GA
52	26	the	boss cyan	26	13	13	15	9
39	13	[ag]	def	13	26	10	9	15
52	spectator		FayD	0	0	0	0	0
55	spectator		pez	0	0	0	0	0
47	spectator		sinkhole	0	0	0	0	0
49	spectator		_inertia	0	0	0	0	0
39	spectator		Drako	0	0	0	0	0
103	spectator		atmos	0	0	0	0	0

Award	Score	Winner(s)
Efficiency	66.7	boss cyan
Frag Streak	17	boss cyan
Spawn Fragger	4	boss cyan
Unluckiest Spawner	4	def

Thursday 19 Jan 2006, 23:20

#1:

inertia

thanks for the nice comments on my map, def

Friday 20 Jan 2006, 09:22

#2:

oneshotflinch

I for one am very impressed by your map. I can tell a lot of hard work and thought went into it. The critisms by def and cyan for the RL placement are probably just honest reactions. If you really want to create a successful level design it's best if you have as many top players play-test it as much possible before releasing the final version.

Each phase of the design development should have a period of playtesting which is conducted primarily by the higher echelon of qw community. The weapon/health/ammo/powerup phase being the final phase and one of the most rigorous as it is key to map balance.

Friday 20 Jan 2006, 13:40

#3:

inertia

oneshotflinch,

thanks for the comment... i did indeed have a lot of very intense playtesting for about 2 months last summer, and i got the thumbs up from alot of top players, who actually had input into the design (see the map .txt for more info).

as it stands, if there is demand for an updated/improved version, then i am willing to accomodate those players who can offer honest criticisms without also shooting down my work.

Friday 20 Jan 2006, 23:10

#4:

phil

cyan likes cookies

Sunday 22 Jan 2006, 07:56

#5:

Anonymous

slip duels - "Where a you??? I'm coming..." :)
slip is ideal for 2x2 and maybe 4x4 or cs duels ;) imho it's too big for duels.

Friday 27 Jan 2006, 13:02

#6:

proz

fu johnny :(!

Wednesday 08 Feb 2006, 20:56

#7:

phil

imho it is not very becoming of players who have played this game for years and years to judge a map based on the merit of a couple week's worth of play

on the other hand, putting a super-fresh map into a tournament is also questionable -- and from the start it was labeled as a "wildcard" map.

i'm sure some of you think you have figured out this map 100% and have a foolproof rebuttal on why it absolutely sucks. but think back to years and years ago when you thought the same about dm4 or dm2 or dm6