Arena (ENDIF)
aken(para
vs
lamerPRO
5 minutes, Deathmatch 4, Teamplay 2
Sun 15 June 2003 on Parba/Mistral QuakeWorld Server [1]
low avg high team total players
40 40 40 abot 187 1
64 64 64 k 6 1
ping pl frags team name Kills Deaths
40 0 187 abot lamerPRO 57 4
64 0 6 k aken(para 4 57
50 0 spectator nemes1s 0 0
13 0 spectator _MaPa_ 0 0
55 3 spectator 0kcus 0 0
244 1 spectator f1_1_2_3 0 0
44 1 spectator Mephisto 0 0
Award Score Winner(s)
Efficiency 97.9 lamerPRO
Frag Streak 21 lamerPRO
Spawn Fragger 22 lamerPRO
Unluckiest Spawner 22 aken(para
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 03:44
#1:
aken
well, at least it did much better in 1on1 than in the prev game, against more opponent at the same map. And i still think that with high twirling it's possible to beat it :)
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 04:01
#2:
Apollyon
Who wants to see aimbots in action? Who wants to see them in existance at all? Fuck off and die. Please delete this crap.
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 04:07
#3:
aken
ooo, it was not me who uploaded it :)
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 04:44
#4:
tiĂll
This guy is anormal, ewerywhere ppl kicked him from the servers, but he always backs with eagerly . He should be banned everywhere fuckin lamer-server-spamer.
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 09:13
#5:
moris
Apollyon: its very interesting to see the way you interpret the words "democracy / freedom".

imo its interesting to play vs an aimbot occasionally just as its interesting playing a chess program. you get bored after sometime (at least i do) but its a challenge trying to beat sth that plays "perfectly" to a certain degree.
i posted the demo yesterday late evening, by now it got 40+ dls, so if you personally dislike it, take the freedom you have and dont bother to dl, while grant the same amount of freedom to those who are interested.

respectfully
moris
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 10:04
#6:
Rhue ]0[
serox used a aimbot vs me the other day on dm4. I think this is him.
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 10:08
#7:
moris
Rhue: nope. this is LamerPRO a .cz "noname" guy who is spottable sometimes on .cz servers. he is a complete noob to qw, he cant move on levels, he has no knowledge of maps etc. he simply enjoys programming this thing and i never heard that he would hide his aimbot status from anyone.
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 11:28
#8:
Apollyon
Everyone "interested" in an aimbot is a potential cheater to me.
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 13:43
#9:
moris
Apollyon: all i can say on this lame comment is LOL
Friday 20 Jun 2003, 14:22
#10:
aken
It was interesting to play against it. Especially that 7vs1 on dm6. It was hard to beat it even for 7 ppl. Nice contest, and it was clear for everyone that this is an aimbot.
Saturday 21 Jun 2003, 09:02
#11:
tobik
lamerpro is fun :) and i totally agree with moris - playing against such aim is a real challenge, and lamer is known for using all available cheats, so it's not like he's some win all games haxor cheator player but a programer, gaining skill his own way. he agreed himself, he's not the best player, so he plays quake from the sourcecode side. just like that guy sittin' behind the screensavers in matrix ;)

and the f_version cmd for his client is "lamerpro is cool dude!" :O try it B>
Saturday 21 Jun 2003, 23:50
#12:
Boroda
This bot is nice, but it doesn't now what to do with power-ups :)
Sunday 22 Jun 2003, 10:47
#13:
rx
the qw scene is not plagued with aimbot cheating in general, now if this is a result of attitudes as Apo's or not could be interesting to think about.

personally i have no problem with people who tries out aimbots or even write them, they're super interesting from a computer science perspective, but using them online... not good. and that's where f_version comes in handy

happy camping
Sunday 22 Jun 2003, 12:50
#14:
hmm
this is the best auto aim i've seen, needs prediction change when powered up but it will be nice if this guy release a bot with this auto aim to practice against
Monday 23 Jun 2003, 04:10
#15:
rev
This is an exceptionally well programmed bot - I think it should be released as well so people can play against it....

I remember Strider was going to program a dm4 bot that played exactly like a human - send him this bot and he might get working again. :D
Monday 23 Jun 2003, 08:07
#16:
moris
some clarification is necessary at this point.
its actually a guy playing having modified everything possible. its not a bot playing.
Monday 23 Jun 2003, 14:12
#17:
Goljat
i have seen much better aim by 'human' player, top players have better rocket aim than aimbots. Shaft is only better with bot, but not so good than champ or paradoks shaft :).
Tuesday 24 Jun 2003, 09:30
#18:
sthfxh
yeh this bot fires ahead. normal aimbot would be behind every shot in midair right?
Tuesday 24 Jun 2003, 15:33
#19:
phil
i used to have respect for Apollyon.. until #8

ive seen most "top10" caliber players hit 40-50% lg's in important situations... sometimes consistent 40-50% on dmm4 levels....

aimbots on the other hand hit 10-100%, more towards 20% in the hands of a laggy cheater (as is usually the case)...

but if its all consensual, there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. as for posting edmos, nothing wrong with that either. saying "fuck off and die" speaks of issues beyond this board, sorry :(
Tuesday 24 Jun 2003, 20:40
#20:
Freznit
Phil you are so wrong, try gotwalls, it will easily get 60+ LG even for 200 ping. Not the gotwalls that had a trojan in it which caught massive people that one time, You may remember it as RVS or whatever. That is why that client lagged players cause it was uploading the status of there cheats. And to the guy who asked about bot's not firing ahead, There was stoogebot for NQ who had rocket prediction. Wasn't quite as good as this bot. And there was also richmark's quakebot based off the terminator source. Do a search for 'richmark quakebot' on google. There is even a QW version of it that has rocket prediction on it, again, none of them compare to this bots rockets from What I've seen though.
Tuesday 24 Jun 2003, 20:58
#21:
moris
latest news: LamerPRO might be improving the quadrocket prediction on endif. Para's assisted endif record shud be owned ez then :) stay tuned
Wednesday 25 Jun 2003, 03:36
#22:
lol
do people not know that para has a aimbot? see if he can hit so many mid air rockets with spectators watching :P

sorry para :p
Wednesday 25 Jun 2003, 06:07
#23:
Apollyon
I think it is quite sad to see this demo get downloaded so often while other very good demos by good players arent downloaded at all. lamerPRO shouldnt waste his time programming useless stuff as this and rather contribute something usefull to the qw community.
Wednesday 25 Jun 2003, 09:10
#24:
moris
dont you think Apollyon it should be the players who decide what they like and what they dont? dont you think a programmer should have the right of programming an aimbot if he likes it rather than something YOU like? would you pls stop posting lame comments? thank you
Wednesday 25 Jun 2003, 15:34
#25:
Apollyon
So you want to tell me that players prefer to watch an aimbot playing rather than a human player? Hey wait that is what the number of downloads implies. Of course he can program what he wants but he accomplishs the mighty feat of both wasting his time and annoying other people. I have no respect for him.
Wednesday 25 Jun 2003, 18:23
#26:
moris
i have tons of fantastic human games but very few if nearly non aimbot games on my hdd. so its quite interesting to have a look at such a "rare" demo. imo that also the reason why ppl dl this. they wanna see sth different from what they usually spec. that doesnt imply anything. if i had to choose between lets say aimbot vs human and duelmania hib vs reppie i would choose the latter.
would you mind not being the uber-wise judge? he wastes his time in programming an aimbot while we waste our time playing qw. does that annoy you? ignore his demos. ez?
Friday 27 Jun 2003, 11:42
#27:
billy
apollyon speak for yourself plz he doesnt annoy me, and whether he is wasting his time it is not for you to decide
Not available (your browser doesn't seem to support WebGL)