4v4: jams vs sexy, E2M2, 07 Mar 2005

jams

chad
def
nih
telly

sexy

Rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

20 minutes, Deathmatch 1, Teamplay 2

Mon 07 March 2005 on quakeworld.nl 4on4

low	avg	high	team	total	players	RA	YA	GA	Quad
25	50	103	jams	130	4	22	23	18	8
38	46	52	sexy	115	4	29	15	19	12

ping	pl	frags	team	name	Kills	TKs	Deaths	RA	YA	GA	QUAD
38	0	37	sexy	sqz	38	1	30	6	6	4	4
25	0	36	jams	chad	36	0	42	5	4	4	1
33	0	35	jams	nih	37	1	21	7	3	6	3
103	0	32	jams	def	36	1	24	7	3	4	2
39	0	28	sexy	aln	31	2	28	5	2	7	1
52	0	27	sexy	fx	28	1	42	7	3	3	4
39	0	27	jams	telly	31	1	52	3	13	4	2
52	0	23	sexy	oco	28	2	48	11	4	5	3
45	0	spectator		tumult	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
117	2	spectator		Kuze Hideo	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Award	Score	Winner(s)
Efficiency	63.6	nih
Frag Streak	20	sqz
Quad Runner	5	nih
Spawn Fragger	6	sqz
Unluckiest Spawner	8	telly

Monday 07 Mar 2005, 18:20

#1:

Anonymous

this is comedy, plain & simple ...
watched jam's chad - he doesn't really know where to go, what to protect or to attack, doesn't realize getting a lg at one point, has bad luck with people spawning and snatch away the guns he's waiting for ... everything entertaining by itself .. but this turns into pure comedy, when all of a sudden, with 4 mins to play, a 40 frags lead & no apparent reason at all they decide to hide ... so they do, seem to be thrilled to the bone & discuss hiding places, or call for the one & only ingenious tactical move: get shaft & discharge... this misconception of a tdm-map should be good for some more laughs in the course of sd6 ... feed me!!!!!

Monday 07 Mar 2005, 18:32

#2:

andy

Hiding and discharging can be a tactical part. A very interesting one, too, that isn't necessary on all maps.

Monday 07 Mar 2005, 18:38

#3:

Anonymous

sure, np with that, but have a look for yourself & you'll see what I mean ... and I didn't want to be rude - it was just so god damn funny, so I appreciate ... only thing serious though: this isn't really a map suited well for 4o4

=)

Tuesday 08 Mar 2005, 08:02

#4:

Apollyon

JAMS not knowing e2m2? ha ha

Tuesday 08 Mar 2005, 12:23

#5:

Rage

Hahaha this is a joke indeed! =) First I cant see why this could be a good tdm map in any way after watching the demo, but maybe im wrong...dunno. Haven't played it myseld.
2nd the hiding was hilarious:) Specially chad pov.

Wednesday 09 Mar 2005, 06:18

#6:

Hagge

it's not a good 4on4 map and everybody knows it. why it has been a smackdownmap has always been followed by a questionmark, but it's the admins that decide and not the players :\

Wednesday 09 Mar 2005, 07:00

#7:

andy

The map was _VOTED_ into the mappool several seasons. It's just this season that it was voted in by admins and not players. And why? I don't know, my guess is that it was the way to keep CMT maps out of the pool.

And I strongly disagree. e2m2 is a great map. It offers many tactical possibilities that "normal" 4on4 maps don't have (which you can clearly see in this demo).

Wednesday 09 Mar 2005, 10:16

#8:

Anonymous

in the long run the delicate intricacies of qw-hiding-galore *could* become a little less interesting ... Of, course, I didn't do a thorough scientific research, it's just a rather bold assumption, but we'll see that, I suppose ...

=)

Friday 11 Mar 2005, 08:52

#9:

Anonymous

well, it would sure be interesting to see some good 4on4 on the E4Mx maps, but maybe it's just me

Sunday 13 Mar 2005, 16:53

#10:

Anonymous

nah, it would be interesting for sure; but, to be serious for once, so far I do not see the potential in this particular map - maybe some teams who actually *do know* the map just have to prove ...
and I sure as heck am looking forward to any "new" map which is entertaining to play/spectate just to get away from this motherfukking tb3-only-bullshit... this "ultraconservative" attitude of the big guns in qw nowadays is boring to tears